But they aren't perfect
Good, better, best
Even companies with good payout ratios aren't all created equal. Yes, we want companies with safe dividends -- but we also want companies with growing dividends.
Two companies may have seemingly identical dividend yields, but if one has a history of hiking its payout significantly and frequently, and the other doesn't, the former suddenly becomes far more attractive. These companies recently had similar yields, but very different histories:
| Company | Dividend yield | 5-yr. avg. div. growth rate |
|---|---|---|
| MetLife (NYSE: MET) | 2.6% | 20% |
| Sherwin-Williams | 2.4% | 18% |
| Raytheon (NYSE: RTN) | 2.6% | 7% |
| Wyeth (NYSE: WYE) | 2.8% | 5% |
Data from DividendInvestor.com.
To see why this matters, just imagine buying $10,000 of stock with a 3.5% dividend yield. In the first year, you'll get $350. If that dividend grows by 4% per year for 20 years, it will ultimately amount to a $767 annual payout. But if it grows by 12%, it will become a $3,375 annual payout -- almost five times more, and more than 30% of your original investment.
What to do right now
The riskiest dividend is one that you can't count on. So, pick your dividend payers carefully -- but do pick some, because our downtrodden market currently offers some exceptionally strong yields.
The following candidates that surfaced when I screened for large caps with yields of 2.5% or more, five-year dividend growth rates of 10% or more, and five-year revenue growth rates of 10% or more:
| Company | Dividend yield | 5-yr div. growth | 5-yr. rev. growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis (NYSE: NVS) | 4.6% | 15% | 11% |
| CNOOC (NYSE: CEO) | 4.2% | 23% | 25% |
| MarathonOil | 3.1% | 16% | 14% |
| General Dynamics | 2.8% | 16% | 12% |
Any screen like this is merely the first step toward further research, but these candidates may be a good place to start.
No comments:
Post a Comment